Chamanara et al. explored the extensive global environmental consequences of Bitcoin mining, emphasizing the critical need for swift intervention. See: Earth’s Futur. 11, e2023EF003871 (2023).
Li et al. conducted research on the amount of power used when mining cryptocurrencies, offering insights into electricity consumption. See: Energy 168, 160–168 (2019).
Krause & Tolaymat presented a quantitative assessment of the energy and carbon costs linked to the mining of cryptocurrencies. See: Nat. Sustain. 1, 711–718 (2018).
Kohli et al. presented an analysis of the energy usage and carbon footprints associated with cryptocurrencies, along with potential solutions for mitigation. See: Digit. Commun. Netw. 9, 79–89 (2023).
Yousaf et al. investigate the effects of fluctuating crypto prices on mining activities and resultant CO2 emissions, especially considering the influence of geopolitical instability. See: Financ. Res. Lett. 72, 106551 (2025).
Corbet et al. analyzed the broader financial market consequences stemming from the energy consumed by cryptocurrencies. Find details at: SSRN Electron. J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3412194 (2019).
Carter provides insights into the total number of Bitcoins in circulation as of 2023. Access the information at Banklesstimes.
Kristoufek explored Bitcoin and its mining within the context of an equilibrium pathway. Refer to: Energy Econ. 85, 104588 (2020).
Howson discussed strategies for using blockchain technology to address climate change issues. See: Nat. Clim. Change 9, 644–645 (2019).
Stoll et al. presented an analysis of the carbon footprint resulting from Bitcoin operations. See: Joule 3, 1647–1661 (2019).
Dey & Tareque researched the connection between electricity usage and GDP in Bangladesh through a time series investigation. See: J. Asian Bus. Econ. Stud. 27, 35–48 (2020).
Vries and De examined the escalating water usage associated with Bitcoin operations. See: Cell. Rep. Sustain. 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsus.2023.100004 (2024).
Jan et al. considered the possible role of blockchain technologies in improving environmental sustainability within the manufacturing sector, mediated by green supply chain management. See: Bus. Strateg. Environ. 1 (2023).
Aneja et al. performed a dynamic assessment on the impact of clean energy and green innovation in achieving environmental sustainability among G-20 nations. See: Sustain. Dev. 32, 2454–2473 (2024).
Nordhaus discussed projections and uncertainties linked to climate change in a scenario where climate policies are minimal. See: Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 10, 333–360 (2018).
Machado & Santos Silva developed a method for calculating quantiles using moments. Refer to: J. Econom. 213, 145–173 (2019).
Share.