Adam Livingston, an author, suggests that Bitcoin (BTC), with its limited supply and decentralized nature, can potentially curb warfare. His argument centers on the idea that Bitcoin eliminates the ability of governments to freely print money, a practice often used to fund wars through the hidden tax of inflation.
Livingston highlights the World Wars of the 20th century as a prime example, coinciding with the growing influence of central banking and the weakening of the gold standard. He argues that fiat currencies facilitate endless wars that would likely not receive public support if transparent wartime taxes were directly imposed.
He also points to historical instances, such as the downfall of paper money under China’s Song dynasty in the 13th century and the hyperinflation of Assignats in 18th-century France, illustrating how governments resort to debasing currencies and overspending to finance conflicts. Livingston stated in a recent discussion:
“Control over currency equals control over politics. When a government can generate currency effortlessly, it gains the ability to engage in acts of aggression beyond what its citizens would support if faced with direct taxation. Essentially, fiat money quietly enables modern warfare.”
Proponents of sound money have long asserted that Bitcoin’s capability to separate money from governmental control can alter humanity’s direction. This parallels the impact of groundbreaking technologies like the printing press, which revolutionized civilization and contributed to the decline of centralized power structures.
Related: Crypto Executive Argues: A Bitcoin Strategic Reserve Could Hurt BTC and the USD
Secure the Currency, Improve the World
Bitcoin advocates maintain that a reliable monetary system is essential for human advancement. They believe transitioning the world toward a Bitcoin standard can foster technological progress, strengthen social bonds, stimulate artistic expression, and enhance overall freedom.
According to Saifedean Ammous, author of “The Bitcoin Standard,” older monetary forms, including gold and paper currencies, have inherent flaws. He argues that gold leads to centralized control of money, while paper currencies serve as poor stores of value due to the practice of unlimited money creation.
Ammous explains that paper currencies systematically diminish the future value for holders each time the issuing authority prints more money to fund governmental expenditures.
This devaluation of currency generates ripple effects throughout society, impacting everything from family dynamics to individual planning for the future.
Ammous contends that societies with unreliable stores of value tend to “discount” the future, while societies with sound money are more likely to prioritize saving, developing transformative technologies, and building lasting societal infrastructure.
Magazine: Tezos Co-Founder Calls Bitcoin ‘Funny Internet Money’ During Economic Uncertainty